Withholding taxes can come into play when you’re considering whether to hold U.S. stocks in a TFSA or RRSP. Knowing where your U.S. stock should be held will help you get the maximum benefit from your investment. For instance, if you have a blue-chip U.S. stock, then you need to consider if your return, even after the 15% IRS withholding tax, will leave you with a better return than Canadian investments. The timing of your retirement can also help determine where you should hold your investments. An RRSP is a better account to keep U.S. stocks, unless you plan on retiring soon in which a TFSA makes more sense.
Key Takeaways:
“If you are intending to hold for a long time, then moving your stocks to your RRSP account and holding Canadian investments in your TFSA may be a good strategy.”
Read more: https://www.moneysense.ca/save/taxes/is-it-better-to-hold-u-s-stocks-in-a-tfsa-or-rrsp/
When Kurt purchased a condo, his father co-signed for the mortgage. Now that he wants to sell the condo and his dad is on the title, he wants to know who will be subject to the capital gains tax? The answer is that regardless of who is the named owner of a piece of property, the person subject to a capital gain tax will be the beneficial owner of the property. The beneficial owner is considered to be the person who maintains possession of the property along with it’s use and risk, often evidenced by things such as maintaining insurance on the property or any entitlement to income.
Key Takeaways:
“Figuring out who “owns” a property is key.”
Read more: When two people are on the title to a condo, who pays capital gains?
Pete has a low fixed-rate mortgage, and although he pays the required bi-weekly payments, he is able to pay an annual lump sum with no fees attached. He can get the money by selling his mutual fund, but he is questioning if this is a good idea. After evaluating the positives and negatives, the answer is no, because the interest rate in the mutual fund is higher than the mortgage interest rate. Another reason not to do this is that there could also be hidden fees and tax consequences (if held within an RRSP) of selling a mutual fund.
Key Takeaways:
“People want to know where their money will be most effective. [But] selling high returns for low-rate debt doesn’t add up.”
Bruce has $15,000 in unused RRSP contribution room and wonders if it makes sense to top up his RRSP. Making an RRSP contribution is a useful way for Canadians to defer taxes and reduce their income to get into a lower bracket. It is also an excellent way of saving for retirement. Up to 18% of gross income can be contributed into an RRSP. However, it is only worthwhile to contribute if it will lower your tax bracket. So, if you are retired and your contribution and withdrawal years will be in the same tax bracket, then contributing to a RRSP is not necessary.
Key Takeaways:
“I’m 70 years old, retired on a fixed income, and my tax bracket is not forecasted to change going forward. My question is, I have $15,000 in unused RRSP room. Should I contribute prior to converting to a RRIF?”
Read more: Should I contribute to an RRSP even though I’m retired?
Income splitting, the practice of small business owners giving dividend income to family members, regardless of their employment status within the company, has been curtailed due to new tax regulations that went into place the first of the year. This increases the tax burden on small businesses. There are however, some ways to continue doing this. If you do it correctly you can income split on your personal income or to spouses and children without breaking the new tax laws.
Key Takeaways:
“There are still a bunch of perfectly legal income-splitting strategies you may want to consider for this tax year.”
Credit scores say a lot about you and your financial health. This three-digit number represents how good someone is at paying back debt borrowed through credit cards, student loans, a line of credit and other similar debt instruments. People with numbers above 700 are deemed very good at paying off these loans. Lower scores may be a result of maxing out credit, missing payments or carrying a balance from one month to the next.
Key Takeaways:
“Credit scores are three-digit numbers with far-reaching consequences. The average Canadian scores around 600, with numbers in the 700 and above considered “very good.””
Owning a business can be very rewarding, and when you’re starting a business, proper preparation and organization can go a long way to setting you up for success. An area of business often overlooked by entrepreneurs is the new task of managing finances and taxes, which can be complicated. Even decisions you make before you begin can affect your business. For instance, while a business owner may need to invest a sizable amount of money upfront, that amount can be claimed as a business expense on your tax return – provided it was incurred after you actually started the business. Therefore, it’s wise to minimize any business expenses until you are up and running.
Key Takeaways:
“Running a successful business takes drive, innovation, passion and … wait for it … organized bookkeeping! That wasn’t what came to mind, was it? Most Canadians don’t dream of owning their own business so they can handle payroll and complicate their income tax return.”
When selling a home, your taxes are impacted too. The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) considers a profit on the sale of property to be a capital gain. But, CRA allows for a primary residence, or family home, to be sold at a profit without having to pay capital gains tax. There are caveats of course. There can be only one family home sold per year and the owner must be legal age and documented. Also, there is a list of acceptable domiciles that are considered home. Check with your accountant or CRA to make sure you qualify.
Key Takeaways:
“Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) provides Canadian homeowners with an exemption from taxes owed on the profit made from the sale of your principal residence.”
In principle, a government proposing tax changes to bring fairness and neutrality to our tax system is welcome. The present federal tax-reform proposals aim to target three key areas: (1) limit the spreading of income as capital-gains, (2) investment in passive assets using corporate after-tax earnings, and (3) corporate earnings paid out as capital gains instead of taxable dividends. However, the current reform proposals appear to have missed their intended target of wealthy, big businesses that try to avoid their taxes. In addition, these changes overlook the principles in the current system for small-business tax treatment, that were a result of balance and compromise over decades, and recognize the considerable financial risk they take when starting, operating or expanding their businesses.
Key Takeaways:
“Expediency should not come at the cost of complexity, inequity, double taxation and retroactivity.”
Read more: How the federal tax-reform proposals miss their target
On July 18, 2017, the Department of Finance released tax proposals and draft legislation that obliterates the current system that has been used in Canada for decades. Rather than targeting the flaws, the government’s proposals amount to tax reform. By saying they are “closing loopholes” and ensuring payment of “fair share of tax,” it is the opinion of this tax lawyer that this language being used to describe these changes is purposely meant to persuade the public into believing that these changes are in their best interest and to keep critical thought about their implications to a minimum. Small- and medium-sized business are vital to our economy, and thus changes require at the very least adequate consideration and discussion before implementation.
Key Takeaways:
“So far, the only answers our government has provided us with are those of the sort that mute public discourse and create unnecessary tension between members of the “middle class”. So far, the government has provided so little time for consultation that the “consultation” can only be inferred to be superficial. The public at large and our entrepreneurs deserve better.”